Relationship Between Non-curved, Non-motorized, Resistance Treadmill Sprinting and Ground Speeds in American Football Players

Main Article Content

Corey A. Peacock
Gabriel J. Sanders
Jacob Peacock
Jose Antonio
Tobin Silver

Keywords

Running, Strength, Conditioning

Abstract




Introduction: The NFL has relied heavily on speed as an indicator of readiness and future success in American football. Recent trends in speed training include the utilization of non-curved, non-motorized, resistance treadmills. Minimal data currently exists examining the use of these treadmills. Therefore, non-curved, non-motorized, resistance treadmills have been hypothesized to correlate with grounded sprints. Methods: 17 male, American football players (26.06 ± 3.72 yr., 184.59 ± 7.95 cm, 101.88 ± 15.96 kg) sprinted at peak speeds during five different trials. Four trials consisted of non-curved, non-motorized treadmill sprints at different incline/resistance settings (i.e. 15RES8, 15RES5, 20RES3, 20RES1). One trial consisted of a 30-yard grounded sprint in which three different data points were recorded (i.e. 10YDSPLIT, 20YDSPLIT, 30YDSPLIT). Multiple correlation analyses examined relationships and significance was set at p< 0.05.
Results: A significant positive correlation (p< 0.05.) existed between 10YDSPLIT and 15RES8, 10YDSPLIT and 20RES3, 20YDSPLIT and 20RES3, 20YDSPLIT and 20RES1, and lastly 30YDSPLIT and 20RES3.
Conclusions: Moderate inclines at higher resistance settings relate to 9.14 m (10 yd) grounded sprints. Data also displayed steeper incline at lower resistance settings relate to grounded sprints through 27.43 m (30 yd).




Abstract 284 | PDF Downloads 264

References

1. Fitzgerald CF, Jensen RL. A Comparison of the National Football League's Annual National Football League Combine 1999-2000 to 2015-2016. J Strength Cond Res. 2018.

2. Hedlund DP. Performance of Future Elite Players at the National Football League Scouting Combine. J Strength Cond Res. 2018;32(11):3112-3118.

3. Sanders G, Roll B, A. Peacock C. Maximum Distance and High-Speed Distance Demands by Position in NCAA Division I Collegiate Football Games. Vol 312017.

4. Sjokvist J, Sandbakk O, Willis SJ, Andersson E, Holmberg HC. The effect of incline on sprint and bounding performance in cross-country skiers. The Journal of sports medicine and physical fitness. 2015;55(5):405-414.

5. Slawinski J, Dorel S, Hug F, et al. Elite long sprint running: a comparison between incline and level training sessions. Medicine and science in sports and exercise. 2008;40(6):1155-1162.

6. Hatchett A, Armstrong K, Parr B, Crews M, Tant C. The Effect of a Curved Non-Motorized Treadmill on Running Gait Length, Imbalance and Stride Angle. Sports (Basel). 2018;6(3).

7. Bruseghini P, Tam E, Monte A, Capelli C, Zamparo P. Metabolic and kinematic responses while walking and running on a motorised and a curved non-motorised treadmill. Journal of sports sciences. 2018:1-8.

8. Horwath O, Paulsen G, Esping T, Seynnes O, Olsson MC. Isokinetic resistance training combined with eccentric overload improves athletic performance and induces muscle hypertrophy in young ice hockey players. Journal of science and medicine in sport. 2019.

9. Macadam P, Cronin JB, Feser EH. Acute and longitudinal effects of weighted vest training on sprint-running performance: a systematic review. Sports Biomech. 2019:1-16.

10. Mann JB, Ivey PA, Mayhew JL, Schumacher RM, Brechue WF. Relationship Between Agility Tests and Short Sprints: Reliability and Smallest Worthwhile Difference in National Collegiate Athletic Association Division-I Football Players. J Strength Cond Res. 2016;30(4):893-900.

Most read articles by the same author(s)