Effectiveness of a Community-Based Health Promotion “Rethink Your Drink” on Reducing Sugary Beverage Consumption: A Case Study

Main Article Content

Priscilla Maghrabi
Miranda Terry

Keywords

Health programming, Obesity, Sweetened drinks

Abstract




Introduction: Obesity rates are rising throughout the United States. As a way to address obesity in a rural city in southwest Kentucky, researchers conducted a “Rethink Your Drink” challenge. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a community health program in reducing the consumption of sugary beverages.
Methods: Researchers conducted a “Rethink Your Drink” Challenge in a rural city in southwest Kentucky. Educational materials illustrated how beverages fell into red, yellow, or green light categories based on sugar content. Materials were provided to corporate sponsors throughout a rural city in southwest Kentucky. Community members (n=296) volunteered to track their beverage consumption over a 4-week period. Researchers collected data sheets at the end of the 4- weeks and analyzed change in beverage habits.
Results: Researchers calculated weekly sugar intake as: [(red drinks * 3) + (yellow drinks * 2.25) + (green drinks * 0)]. Sugary beverage consumption decreased over the four weeks (t = 9.2, p < 0.001).
Conclusions: A community health program addressing sugary beverage consumption is an effective method to bring awareness to the hidden sugars and calories, which lead to obesity and obesity related diseases.




Abstract 208 | PDF Downloads 143

References

1. McGuire S. Scientific Report of the 2015 Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee. Washington, DC: US Departments of Agriculture and Health and Human Services, 2015. Adv Nutr. 2016;7(1):202-204.

2. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service. Nutrient Intakes from Food and Beverages: Mean Amounts Consumed per Individual, by Gender and Age. What We Eat in America, NHANES 2013-2014.
https://www.ars.usda.gov/ARSUserFiles/80400530/pdf/1314/Table_1_NIN_GE N_13.pdf.

3. HHS, Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion (U.S.), USDA , Center for Nutrition Policy Promotion (U.S.). Dietary Guidelines for Americans 2015- 2020. Government Printing Office; 2015.

4. United States Department of Agriculture and United States Department of Health and Human Services (2010). Dietary Guidelines for Americans, 2010. 7th edition, Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, December 2010. https://health.gov/dietaryguidelines/dga2010/DietaryGuidelines2010.pdf

5. de Koning L, Malik VS, Rimm EB, Willett WC, Hu FB. Sugar-sweetened and artificially sweetened beverage consumption and risk of type 2 diabetes in men. Am J Clin Nutr. 2011;93(6):1321-1327.

6. American Diabetes Association. Economic costs of diabetes in the U.S. in 2012. Diabetes Care. 2013;36(4):1033-1046.

7. Hu FB. Resolved: there is sufficient scientific evidence that decreasing sugar- sweetened beverage consumption will reduce the prevalence of obesity and obesity-related diseases. Obes Rev. 2013;14(8):606-619.

8. McGuire S. Scientific Report of the 2015 Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee. Washington, DC: US Departments of Agriculture and Health and Human Services, 2015. Adv Nutr. 2016;7(1):202-204.

9. Raatz, S. The Question of Sugar. Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department
of Agriculture. 2016. https://www.ars.usda.gov/plains- area/gfnd/gfhnrc/docs/news-2012/the-question-of-sugar/

10. Schwartz MB, Schneider GE, Choi Y-Y, et al. Association of a Community Campaign for Better Beverage Choices With Beverage Purchases From Supermarkets. JAMA Intern Med. 2017;177(5):666-674.