Body Composition as a Predictor of Performance on the Army Combat Fitness Test Total Score for ROTC Cadets Original Research

Main Article Content

Anthony Acevedo
Zachary Zeigler
Bridget Melton

Keywords

Army, Body fat, Fat-free mass

Abstract

Introduction: Body composition characteristics vary between soldiers and could affect performance outcomes. The study aims to determine whether %body fat (%BF) and fat-free mass (FFM) can predict performance outcomes of the Army Combat Fitness Test (ACFT) in ROTC cadets.


Methods: ROTC cadets (54 males, 17 females; aged 21.40 ± 3.79 years) completed the 6-event ACFT (3-repetition maximum trap-bar deadlift [MDL], standing power toss [SPT], hand-release pushups [HRPU], sprint-drag-carry shuttle run [SDC], plank [PLK], and 2-mile run [2MR]). The ability of body composition to predict ACFT performance was determined with a linear regression model. Significance was set at p < 0.05.


Results: %BF was significantly and negatively correlated to HRPU (r = -.467, p < .001) SDC (r = -.367, p = .002), PLK (r = -.453, p < .001), 2MR (r = -.384, p < .001), and overall ACFT score (r = -.483, p < .001). FFM was significantly correlated to MDL (r = .310, p = .008), SPT (r = .424, p < .001) SDC (r = .388, p < .001), PLK (r = .363, p = .002), and overall ACFT score (r = .423, p < .001).


Conclusion: It is shown that evaluating body composition is a reliable predictor of performance in the ACFT. Consequently, there is a need to reevaluate the Army's body composition standards to align them with the significance of FFM in determining ACFT outcomes. Recognizing that body composition can be modified, soldiers can utilize this information to develop tailored strategies for enhancing their ACFT performance.

Abstract 305 | PDF Downloads 138

References

1. Knapik JJ, East WB. History of United States Army physical fitness and physical readiness training. US Army Med Dep J. 2014 Apr-Jun 2014:5-19.
2. Army Dot. The Army Body Composition Program, Army Regulation 600-9. Washington, DC: Department of the Army; 2013.
3. Bigelman KA, East WB, Thomas DM, Turner D, Hertling M. The New Army Combat Fitness Test: An Opportunity to Improve Recruitment and Retainment. Obesity (Silver Spring). 11 2019;27(11):1772-1775. doi:10.1002/oby.22619
4. Roberts BM, Rushing KA, Plaisance EP. Sex Differences in Body Composition and Fitness Scores in Military Reserve Officers' Training Corps Cadets. Mil Med. Jan 15 2021; doi:10.1093/milmed/usaa496
5. Friedl KE. Body composition and military performance--many things to many people. J Strength Cond Res. Jul 2012;26 Suppl 2: S87-100. doi:10.1519/JSC.0b013e31825ced6c
6. Steed CL, Krull BR, Morgan AL, Tucker RM, Ludy MJ. Relationship Between Body Fat and Physical Fitness in Army ROTC Cadets. Mil Med. 09 2016;181(9):1007-12. doi:10.7205/MILMED-D-15-00425
7. Heileson JL, McGowen JM, Moris JM, et al. Body Composition, Eicosapentaenoic Acid, and Vitamin D are Associated with Army Combat Fitness Test Performance. J Int Soc Sports Nutr. 2022;19(1):349-365. doi:10.1080/15502783.2022.2094717
8. Barringer ND, McKinnon CJ, OʼBrien NC, Kardouni JR. Relationship of Strength and Conditioning Metrics to Success on the Army Ranger Physical Assessment Test. J Strength Cond Res. Apr 2019;33(4):958-964. doi:10.1519/JSC.0000000000003044
9. Pihlainen K, Santtila M, Häkkinen K, Kyröläinen H. Associations of Physical Fitness and Body Composition Characteristics with Simulated Military Task Performance. J Strength Cond Res. Apr 2018;32(4):1089-1098. doi:10.1519/JSC.0000000000001921
10. Aandstad A. Association Between Performance in Muscle Fitness Field Tests and Skeletal Muscle Mass in Soldiers. Mil Med. 06 08 2020;185(5-6):e839-e846. doi:10.1093/milmed/usz437
11. Clinical Guidelines on the Identification, Evaluation, and Treatment of Overweight and Obesity in Adults--The Evidence Report. National Institutes of Health. Obes Res. Sep 1998;6 Suppl 2:51S-209S.
12. Lohman TG, Roche, A.F. and Martorell, R. Anthropometric standardization reference manual.: Human Kinetics Books, Chicago.; 1988.
13. Maddalozzo GF, Cardinal BJ, Snow CA. Concurrent validity of the BOD POD and dual energy x-ray absorptiometry techniques for assessing body composition in young women. J Am Diet Assoc. Nov 2002;102(11):1677-9. doi:10.1016/s0002-8223(02)90358-5
14. US Army ACFT Field Testing Manual. U.S. Army Center for Initial Military Training, TRADOC, Fort Eustis, VA2022.
15. Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.1988.
16. Farina EK, Thompson LA, Knapik JJ, Pasiakos SM, McClung JP, Lieberman HR. Anthropometrics and Body Composition Predict Physical Performance and Selection to Attend Special Forces Training in United States Army Soldiers. Mil Med. 2021; doi:10.1093/milmed/usab315
17. Hardison C, Paul W. Mayberry, Krull, Messan Setojdi CP, Madison, R, Simpson MA, TOTTEN, M, WONG, W. Independent Review of the Army Combat Fitness Test. e RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, Calif.; 2022.
18. Fitts RH, McDonald KS, Schluter JM. The determinants of skeletal muscle force and power: their adaptability with changes in activity pattern. J Biomech. 1991;24 Suppl 1:111-22. doi:10.1016/0021-9290(91)90382-w
19. Beynon S. No More Tape Test, But Only For Soldiers That Crush the Fitness Test. 2022.
20. Farina EK, Thompson LA, Knapik JJ, Pasiakos SM, Lieberman HR, McClung JP. Diet Quality Is Associated with Physical Performance and Special Forces Selection. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 01 2020;52(1):178-186. doi:10.1249/MSS.0000000000002111
21. U.S. Army Demographics. 2022.